← back
Fanout Query Analysis

Fanout Query Analysis

An analysis of 365,920 fanout queries from Google, OpenAI, and Amazon reveals how different AI models generate internal search queries for web grounding.

When AI models like Gemini, GPT or Nova answer a question using web search, they don’t just run your query as-is. They generate their own internal search queries, or fanout queries. A single user prompt can trigger multiple fanout queries as the model breaks down the question, explores subtopics and verifies information.

We captured 365,920 of these fanout queries across three providers, Google (Gemini), OpenAI (GPT) and Amazon (Nova), by logging the grounding metadata returned from their APIs during citation mining runs. This data comes from real production workloads across multiple projects, not synthetic benchmarks.

Four histograms showing the distribution of fanout query word counts for Amazon, Google, OpenAI, and all three normalized.

Below is an analysis of how these providers differ in the queries they generate.

ProviderCountAvg CharsMinMax1-3 words4-6 words7+ words
Google158,1865202524.5%30.6%64.9%
OpenAI207,1746063233.4%20.8%75.8%
Amazon56059281980.2%16.2%83.6%
Total~365,9205603233.9%25.0%71.1%

Google (n=158,184)

WordsCount%Cumul%
1530.0%0.0%
21,0920.7%0.7%
35,9943.8%4.5%
414,9169.4%13.9%
517,47111.0%25.0%
615,92310.1%35.1%
718,08011.4%46.5%
820,32512.8%59.3%
920,01312.7%72.0%
1016,96810.7%82.7%
1111,7407.4%90.1%
127,3164.6%94.8%
134,0432.6%97.3%
142,1241.3%98.7%
15+1,1460.7%100.0%

OpenAI (n=207,174)

WordsCount%Cumul%
16160.3%0.3%
23,7151.8%2.1%
32,6911.3%3.4%
47,3603.6%6.9%
514,5167.0%13.9%
621,22110.2%24.2%
726,54412.8%37.0%
828,91214.0%51.0%
927,86113.4%64.4%
1023,35411.3%75.7%
1117,8758.6%84.3%
1212,3396.0%90.3%
137,9833.9%94.1%
144,9592.4%96.5%
15+5,2282.5%100.0%

Amazon (n=560)

WordsCount%Cumul%
310.2%0.2%
440.7%0.9%
5234.1%5.0%
66411.4%16.4%
710218.2%34.6%
811019.6%54.3%
911320.2%74.5%
106411.4%85.9%
11356.2%92.1%
12203.6%95.7%
1391.6%97.3%
1450.9%98.2%
15+101.8%100.0%

POS Distribution by Provider

A bar chart comparing part-of-speech distributions across AI search queries shows that nouns are the most dominant word type for all three providers.

Radar chart comparing parts of speech used in search queries by Google, OpenAI, and Amazon, showing nouns are dominant for all three.

GroupGoogleOpenAIAmazon
Nouns52.3%58.4%50.2%
Verbs11.3%9.9%8.5%
Adjectives11.0%8.9%18.6%
Prepositions7.4%3.5%10.3%
Wh-words3.6%2.1%1.5%
Numbers2.2%5.3%2.8%
Determiners2.6%1.8%0.1%
Conjunctions1.6%0.6%2.4%
Adverbs0.6%0.7%2.3%
Modals0.7%0.5%0.0%
Pronouns1.2%0.9%0.1%
  1. OpenAI is the most noun-heavy (58.4%), especially proper nouns (18.9% vs Google’s 8.6%) — it generates more entity-specific queries
  2. Amazon leans heavily into adjectives (18.6% vs ~10% for others) — more descriptive, qualifier-rich queries like “best,” “top,” “most effective”
  3. Google uses more wh-words and verbs — generates more question-style queries (“what,” “how,” “which”)
  4. OpenAI uses 2x more numbers (5.3%) — likely year references and quantities in queries
Dan Petrovic · Mar 20, 11:58